Screener
HAP vs LFEQ
VanEck Natural Resources ETF vs VanEck Long/Flat Trend ETF
Key differences
- HAP costs 0.17% less per year.
- HAP is significantly larger than LFEQ — larger funds tend to be more liquid and less likely to close.
- HAP is classified as equity, while LFEQ is alternative — different risk/return profiles.
- HAP covers global markets; LFEQ covers north america.
- HAP follows a index tracking strategy; LFEQ uses tactical allocation.
- HAP has a longer track record, which may reduce uncertainty around long-term behavior.
Side-by-side comparison
| HAP | LFEQ | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 0.41% | 0.58% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $316M | $29M |
| Since | 2008 | 2017 |
| Dividend yield | 1.86% | 0.86% |
| Asset class | equity | alternative |
| Region | global | north america |
| Strategy | index tracking | tactical allocation |
| CAGR 1Y | +47.8% | +28.5% |
| CAGR 3Y | +18.4% | +19.0% |
| CAGR 5Y | +11.3% | +10.0% |
| Sharpe 3Y | 0.92 | 1.03 |
| Volatility 1Y | 14.91% | 12.13% |
| Max drawdown | -44.14% | -35.19% |
Green dot indicates the better value for that metric. Performance data is historical and does not predict future results.
Similar to HAP and LFEQ
Explore further