Screener
BWZ vs EMTL
State Street SPDR Bloomberg Short Term International Treasury Bond ETF vs State Street DoubleLine Emerging Markets Fixed Income ETF
Key differences
- BWZ costs 0.30% less per year.
- BWZ is significantly larger than EMTL — larger funds tend to be more liquid and less likely to close.
- Over the last 3 years, EMTL has delivered higher annualized returns.
- BWZ has a longer track record, which may reduce uncertainty around long-term behavior.
Side-by-side comparison
| BWZ | EMTL | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 0.35% | 0.65% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $324M | $90M |
| Since | 2009 | 2016 |
| Dividend yield | 2.02% | 4.99% |
| Asset class | fixed income | fixed income |
| Region | — | emerging markets |
| Strategy | index tracking | index tracking |
| CAGR 1Y | +0.5% | +5.7% |
| CAGR 3Y | +2.2% | +6.8% |
| CAGR 5Y | -2.0% | +1.7% |
| Sharpe 3Y | -0.14 | 1.01 |
| Volatility 1Y | 7.03% | 2.22% |
| Max drawdown | -24.89% | -22.91% |
Green dot indicates the better value for that metric. Performance data is historical and does not predict future results.
Similar to BWZ and EMTL
Explore further