Screener
BWZ vs SJNK
State Street SPDR Bloomberg Short Term International Treasury Bond ETF vs State Street SPDR Bloomberg Short Term High Yield Bond ETF
Key differences
- BWZ costs 0.05% less per year.
- SJNK is significantly larger than BWZ — larger funds tend to be more liquid and less likely to close.
- Over the last 3 years, SJNK has delivered higher annualized returns.
Side-by-side comparison
| BWZ | SJNK | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 0.35% | 0.40% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $324M | $4.8B |
| Since | 2009 | 2012 |
| Dividend yield | 2.02% | 7.06% |
| Asset class | fixed income | fixed income |
| Region | — | north america |
| Strategy | index tracking | index tracking |
| CAGR 1Y | +0.5% | +7.3% |
| CAGR 3Y | +2.2% | +8.5% |
| CAGR 5Y | -2.0% | +4.9% |
| Sharpe 3Y | -0.14 | 1.06 |
| Volatility 1Y | 7.03% | 3.22% |
| Max drawdown | -24.89% | -19.74% |
Green dot indicates the better value for that metric. Performance data is historical and does not predict future results.
Similar to BWZ and SJNK
Explore further