Screener
BYLD vs FCLO
iShares Yield Optimized Bond ETF vs Fidelity CLO ETF
Key differences
- FCLO costs 0.13% less per year.
- BYLD is significantly larger than FCLO — larger funds tend to be more liquid and less likely to close.
- BYLD follows a index tracking strategy; FCLO uses multi strategy.
- BYLD has a longer track record, which may reduce uncertainty around long-term behavior.
Side-by-side comparison
| BYLD | FCLO | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 0.13% | 0.00% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $387M | $25M |
| Since | 2014 | 2026 |
| Dividend yield | 5.35% | — |
| Asset class | fixed income | fixed income |
| Region | north america | — |
| Strategy | index tracking | multi strategy |
| CAGR 1Y | +7.7% | N/A |
| CAGR 3Y | +6.6% | N/A |
| CAGR 5Y | +2.4% | N/A |
| Sharpe 3Y | 0.63 | N/A |
| Volatility 1Y | 3.86% | — |
| Max drawdown | -14.75% | -0.58% |
Green dot indicates the better value for that metric. Performance data is historical and does not predict future results.
Similar to BYLD and FCLO
Explore further