Screener
BYRE vs APMU
Principal Real Estate Active Opportunities ETF vs ActivePassive Intermediate Municipal Bond ETF
Key differences
- APMU costs 0.25% less per year.
- APMU is significantly larger than BYRE — larger funds tend to be more liquid and less likely to close.
- BYRE is classified as equity, while APMU is fixed income — different risk/return profiles.
- Over the last 3 years, BYRE has delivered higher annualized returns.
Side-by-side comparison
| BYRE | APMU | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 0.60% | 0.35% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $25M | $224M |
| Since | 2022 | 2023 |
| Dividend yield | 2.46% | 2.64% |
| Asset class | equity | fixed income |
| Region | — | north america |
| Strategy | active selection | active selection |
| CAGR 1Y | +12.9% | +3.9% |
| CAGR 3Y | +10.1% | +2.5% |
| CAGR 5Y | N/A | N/A |
| Sharpe 3Y | 0.47 | -0.37 |
| Volatility 1Y | 12.34% | 2.35% |
| Max drawdown | -25.70% | -4.39% |
Green dot indicates the better value for that metric. Performance data is historical and does not predict future results.
Similar to BYRE and APMU
Explore further