Screener
CAFX vs GVI
Congress Intermediate Bond ETF vs iShares Intermediate Government/Credit Bond ETF
Key differences
- GVI costs 0.15% less per year.
- GVI is significantly larger than CAFX — larger funds tend to be more liquid and less likely to close.
- CAFX follows a active selection strategy; GVI uses index tracking.
- GVI has a longer track record, which may reduce uncertainty around long-term behavior.
Side-by-side comparison
| CAFX | GVI | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 0.35% | 0.20% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $325M | $3.8B |
| Since | 2024 | 2007 |
| Dividend yield | 3.99% | 3.56% |
| Asset class | fixed income | fixed income |
| Region | north america | north america |
| Strategy | active selection | index tracking |
| CAGR 1Y | +4.3% | +4.3% |
| CAGR 3Y | N/A | +3.9% |
| CAGR 5Y | N/A | +1.0% |
| Sharpe 3Y | N/A | 0.12 |
| Volatility 1Y | 2.91% | 2.52% |
| Max drawdown | -2.63% | -12.93% |
Green dot indicates the better value for that metric. Performance data is historical and does not predict future results.
Similar to CAFX and GVI
Explore further