Screener
GVI vs NEAR
iShares Intermediate Government/Credit Bond ETF vs iShares Short Duration Bond Active ETF
Key differences
- GVI follows a index tracking strategy; NEAR uses active selection.
- Over the last 3 years, NEAR has delivered higher annualized returns.
- GVI has a longer track record, which may reduce uncertainty around long-term behavior.
Side-by-side comparison
| GVI | NEAR | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 0.20% | 0.25% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $3.8B | $4.3B |
| Since | 2007 | 2013 |
| Dividend yield | 3.56% | 4.48% |
| Asset class | fixed income | fixed income |
| Region | north america | north america |
| Strategy | index tracking | active selection |
| CAGR 1Y | +4.3% | +4.4% |
| CAGR 3Y | +3.9% | +5.6% |
| CAGR 5Y | +1.0% | +3.8% |
| Sharpe 3Y | 0.12 | 1.18 |
| Volatility 1Y | 2.52% | 1.37% |
| Max drawdown | -12.93% | -9.61% |
Green dot indicates the better value for that metric. Performance data is historical and does not predict future results.
Similar to GVI and NEAR
Explore further