Skip to content
Screener

CAOS vs PLGI

Alpha Architect Tail Risk ETF vs PL Growth and Income ETF

CAOS

Alpha Architect Tail Risk ETF

Annual cost

0.63%

Fund size

$669M

PLGI

PL Growth and Income ETF

Annual cost

1.25%

Fund size

$54M

Key differences

Both CAOS and PLGI are alternative ETFs. CAOS charges 0.63% a year and PLGI 1.25%. The main difference: CAOS follows a volatility strategy strategy; PLGI uses option income.

  • CAOS follows a volatility strategy strategy; PLGI uses option income.
  • CAOS costs 0.62% less per year.
  • CAOS is much larger than PLGI. Larger funds are usually more liquid and less likely to close.
  • CAOS has a longer track record, which may reduce uncertainty around long-term behavior.

Side-by-side comparison

CAOSPLGI
Annual cost (TER)0.63%1.25%
Fund size (AUM)$669M$54M
Since20132025
Dividend yield0.00%
Asset classalternativealternative
Regionnorth americanorth america
Strategyvolatility strategyoption income
CAGR 1Y+1.9%N/A
CAGR 3Y+4.3%N/A
CAGR 5YN/AN/A
Sharpe 3Y0.19N/A
Volatility 1Y1.53%
Max drawdown-3.60%-7.26%

Beyond the comparison: Beacon helps you build, track, and project a portfolio with the ETFs you pick.

See all income funds

Similar to CAOS and PLGI