Skip to content
Beacon
Screener

CAOS vs TAIL

Alpha Architect Tail Risk ETF vs Cambria Tail Risk ETF

CAOS

Alpha Architect Tail Risk ETF

Annual cost

0.63%

Fund size

$650M

TAIL

Cambria Tail Risk ETF

Annual cost

0.59%

Fund size

$157M

Key differences

  • CAOS is significantly larger than TAIL — larger funds tend to be more liquid and less likely to close.
  • CAOS follows a option income strategy; TAIL uses tactical allocation.
  • Over the last 3 years, CAOS has delivered higher annualized returns.

Side-by-side comparison

CAOSTAIL
Annual cost (TER)0.63%0.59%
Fund size (AUM)$650M$157M
Since20132017
Dividend yield0.00%3.41%
Asset classalternativealternative
Regionnorth americanorth america
Strategyoption incometactical allocation
CAGR 1Y+2.1%-9.0%
CAGR 3Y+4.8%-6.3%
CAGR 5YN/A-8.5%
Sharpe 3Y0.35-0.64
Volatility 1Y1.52%8.55%
Max drawdown-3.60%-52.37%

Similar to CAOS and TAIL