Screener
CAOS vs BHDG
Alpha Architect Tail Risk ETF vs Nicholas Bitcoin Tail ETF
Key differences
- BHDG costs 0.63% less per year.
- CAOS is significantly larger than BHDG — larger funds tend to be more liquid and less likely to close.
- CAOS has a longer track record, which may reduce uncertainty around long-term behavior.
Side-by-side comparison
| CAOS | BHDG | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 0.63% | 0.00% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $650M | $13M |
| Since | 2013 | 2026 |
| Dividend yield | 0.00% | — |
| Asset class | alternative | alternative |
| Region | north america | — |
| Strategy | option income | option income |
| CAGR 1Y | +2.1% | N/A |
| CAGR 3Y | +4.8% | N/A |
| CAGR 5Y | N/A | N/A |
| Sharpe 3Y | 0.35 | N/A |
| Volatility 1Y | 1.52% | — |
| Max drawdown | -3.60% | -15.07% |
Similar to CAOS and BHDG
Explore further