Screener
CARZ vs QCLN
First Trust S-Network Future Vehicles & Technology ETF vs First Trust NASDAQ Clean Edge Green Energy Index Fund
Key differences
- QCLN costs 0.11% less per year.
- QCLN is significantly larger than CARZ — larger funds tend to be more liquid and less likely to close.
- Over the last 3 years, CARZ has delivered higher annualized returns.
Side-by-side comparison
| CARZ | QCLN | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 0.70% | 0.59% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $51M | $739M |
| Since | 2011 | 2007 |
| Dividend yield | 1.62% | 0.17% |
| Asset class | equity | equity |
| Region | — | north america |
| Strategy | index tracking | index tracking |
| CAGR 1Y | +114.2% | +118.3% |
| CAGR 3Y | +35.1% | +12.8% |
| CAGR 5Y | +18.4% | +3.2% |
| Sharpe 3Y | 1.13 | 0.42 |
| Volatility 1Y | 26.03% | 34.72% |
| Max drawdown | -51.20% | -71.73% |
Green dot indicates the better value for that metric. Performance data is historical and does not predict future results.
Similar to CARZ and QCLN
Explore further