Screener
QCLN vs ISHP
First Trust NASDAQ Clean Edge Green Energy Index Fund vs First Trust S-Network Global E-Commerce ETF
Key differences
- QCLN is significantly larger than ISHP — larger funds tend to be more liquid and less likely to close.
- QCLN covers north america markets; ISHP covers global.
- Over the last 3 years, QCLN has delivered higher annualized returns.
- QCLN has a longer track record, which may reduce uncertainty around long-term behavior.
Side-by-side comparison
| QCLN | ISHP | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 0.59% | 0.60% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $739M | $5M |
| Since | 2007 | 2016 |
| Dividend yield | 0.17% | 1.49% |
| Asset class | equity | equity |
| Region | north america | global |
| Strategy | index tracking | index tracking |
| CAGR 1Y | +118.3% | -9.1% |
| CAGR 3Y | +12.8% | +11.1% |
| CAGR 5Y | +3.2% | +2.5% |
| Sharpe 3Y | 0.42 | 0.44 |
| Volatility 1Y | 34.72% | 17.08% |
| Max drawdown | -71.73% | -47.57% |
Green dot indicates the better value for that metric. Performance data is historical and does not predict future results.
Similar to QCLN and ISHP
Explore further