Screener
CATF vs MUB
American Century California Municipal Bond ETF vs iShares National Muni Bond ETF
Key differences
- MUB costs 0.22% less per year.
- MUB is significantly larger than CATF — larger funds tend to be more liquid and less likely to close.
- CATF follows a active selection strategy; MUB uses index tracking.
- MUB has a longer track record, which may reduce uncertainty around long-term behavior.
Side-by-side comparison
| CATF | MUB | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 0.27% | 0.05% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $75M | $43.7B |
| Since | 2024 | 2007 |
| Dividend yield | 3.55% | 3.17% |
| Asset class | fixed income | fixed income |
| Region | north america | north america |
| Strategy | active selection | index tracking |
| CAGR 1Y | +7.0% | +5.7% |
| CAGR 3Y | N/A | +2.9% |
| CAGR 5Y | N/A | +0.8% |
| Sharpe 3Y | N/A | -0.14 |
| Volatility 1Y | 3.14% | 2.91% |
| Max drawdown | -4.83% | -13.68% |
Green dot indicates the better value for that metric. Performance data is historical and does not predict future results.
Similar to CATF and MUB
Explore further