Screener
MUB vs CMF
iShares National Muni Bond ETF vs iShares California Muni Bond ETF
Key differences
- MUB is significantly larger than CMF — larger funds tend to be more liquid and less likely to close.
Side-by-side comparison
| MUB | CMF | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 0.05% | 0.08% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $43.7B | $4.3B |
| Since | 2007 | 2007 |
| Dividend yield | 3.17% | 2.96% |
| Asset class | fixed income | fixed income |
| Region | north america | north america |
| Strategy | index tracking | index tracking |
| CAGR 1Y | +5.7% | +5.8% |
| CAGR 3Y | +2.9% | +2.8% |
| CAGR 5Y | +0.8% | +0.5% |
| Sharpe 3Y | -0.14 | -0.17 |
| Volatility 1Y | 2.91% | 2.81% |
| Max drawdown | -13.68% | -14.57% |
Green dot indicates the better value for that metric. Performance data is historical and does not predict future results.
Similar to MUB and CMF
Explore further