Screener
CBON vs ISRA
VanEck China Bond ETF vs VanEck Israel ETF
Key differences
CBON is a fixed income ETF, while ISRA is an equity ETF. CBON charges 0.50% a year and ISRA 0.59%.
- CBON is a fixed income fund, while ISRA is an equity fund. They carry different risk/return profiles.
- CBON costs 0.09% less per year.
- ISRA is much larger than CBON. Larger funds are usually more liquid and less likely to close.
- Over the last three years, ISRA has delivered higher annualized returns.
Side-by-side comparison
| CBON | ISRA | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 0.50% | 0.59% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $24M | $167M |
| Since | 2014 | 2013 |
| Dividend yield | 1.56% | 1.24% |
| Asset class | fixed income | equity |
| Region | emerging markets | emerging markets |
| Strategy | index tracking | index tracking |
| CAGR 1Y | +8.6% | +36.7% |
| CAGR 3Y | +4.9% | +25.0% |
| CAGR 5Y | +1.8% | +8.4% |
| Sharpe 3Y | 0.31 | 1.03 |
| Volatility 1Y | 3.46% | 21.14% |
| Max drawdown | -14.13% | -45.02% |
Similar to CBON and ISRA
Explore further