Screener
CBON vs MCHI
VanEck China Bond ETF vs iShares MSCI China ETF
Key differences
CBON is a fixed income ETF, while MCHI is an equity ETF. CBON charges 0.50% a year and MCHI 0.59%.
- CBON is a fixed income fund, while MCHI is an equity fund. They carry different risk/return profiles.
- CBON costs 0.09% less per year.
- MCHI is much larger than CBON. Larger funds are usually more liquid and less likely to close.
- Over the last three years, MCHI has delivered higher annualized returns.
Side-by-side comparison
| CBON | MCHI | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 0.50% | 0.59% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $24M | $6.3B |
| Since | 2014 | 2011 |
| Dividend yield | 1.56% | 2.30% |
| Asset class | fixed income | equity |
| Region | emerging markets | emerging markets |
| Strategy | index tracking | index tracking |
| CAGR 1Y | +8.6% | +1.6% |
| CAGR 3Y | +4.9% | +10.9% |
| CAGR 5Y | +1.8% | -5.8% |
| Sharpe 3Y | 0.31 | 0.38 |
| Volatility 1Y | 3.46% | 20.20% |
| Max drawdown | -14.13% | -62.84% |
Similar to CBON and MCHI
Explore further