Screener
CCNR vs CTEX
ALPS/CoreCommodity Natural Resources ETF vs ProShares S&P Kensho Cleantech ETF
Key differences
- CCNR costs 0.19% less per year.
- CCNR is significantly larger than CTEX — larger funds tend to be more liquid and less likely to close.
- CCNR covers global markets; CTEX covers north america.
- CCNR follows a active selection strategy; CTEX uses index tracking.
Side-by-side comparison
| CCNR | CTEX | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 0.39% | 0.58% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $394M | $6M |
| Since | 2024 | 2021 |
| Dividend yield | 2.77% | 1.85% |
| Asset class | equity | equity |
| Region | global | north america |
| Strategy | active selection | index tracking |
| CAGR 1Y | +70.4% | +156.4% |
| CAGR 3Y | N/A | +18.2% |
| CAGR 5Y | N/A | N/A |
| Sharpe 3Y | N/A | 0.53 |
| Volatility 1Y | 17.71% | 41.38% |
| Max drawdown | -20.06% | -70.30% |
Green dot indicates the better value for that metric. Performance data is historical and does not predict future results.
Similar to CCNR and CTEX
Explore further