Skip to content
Beacon
Screener

CTEX vs ACES

ProShares S&P Kensho Cleantech ETF vs ALPS Clean Energy ETF

CTEX

ProShares S&P Kensho Cleantech ETF

ProShares

Annual cost

0.58%

Fund size

$6M

ACES

ALPS Clean Energy ETF

ALPS

Annual cost

0.55%

Fund size

$127M

Key differences

  • ACES is significantly larger than CTEX — larger funds tend to be more liquid and less likely to close.
  • Over the last 3 years, CTEX has delivered higher annualized returns.

Side-by-side comparison

CTEXACES
Annual cost (TER)0.58%0.55%
Fund size (AUM)$6M$127M
Since20212018
Dividend yield1.85%0.64%
Asset classequityequity
Regionnorth americanorth america
Strategyindex trackingindex tracking
CAGR 1Y+156.4%+69.1%
CAGR 3Y+18.2%+0.1%
CAGR 5YN/A-8.1%
Sharpe 3Y0.530.07
Volatility 1Y41.38%32.22%
Max drawdown-70.30%-79.05%

Green dot indicates the better value for that metric. Performance data is historical and does not predict future results.

Similar to CTEX and ACES