Screener
CCOR vs AGOX
Core Alternative ETF vs Adaptive Alpha Opportunities ETF
Key differences
- AGOX is significantly larger than CCOR — larger funds tend to be more liquid and less likely to close.
- CCOR follows a option income strategy; AGOX uses active selection.
- Over the last 3 years, AGOX has delivered higher annualized returns.
- AGOX has a longer track record, which may reduce uncertainty around long-term behavior.
Side-by-side comparison
| CCOR | AGOX | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 1.29% | 1.33% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $28M | $364M |
| Since | 2017 | 2012 |
| Dividend yield | 1.08% | 0.00% |
| Asset class | alternative | alternative |
| Region | north america | — |
| Strategy | option income | active selection |
| CAGR 1Y | -4.9% | +25.0% |
| CAGR 3Y | -2.5% | +18.6% |
| CAGR 5Y | -2.3% | +8.6% |
| Sharpe 3Y | -0.56 | 0.78 |
| Volatility 1Y | 6.92% | 18.38% |
| Max drawdown | -22.99% | -27.72% |
Green dot indicates the better value for that metric. Performance data is historical and does not predict future results.
Similar to CCOR and AGOX
Explore further