Screener
CCOR vs AOK
Core Alternative ETF vs iShares Core 30/70 Conservative Allocation ETF
Key differences
- AOK costs 1.14% less per year.
- AOK is significantly larger than CCOR — larger funds tend to be more liquid and less likely to close.
- CCOR is classified as alternative, while AOK is mixed asset — different risk/return profiles.
- CCOR follows a option income strategy; AOK uses active selection.
- Over the last 3 years, AOK has delivered higher annualized returns.
- AOK has a longer track record, which may reduce uncertainty around long-term behavior.
Side-by-side comparison
| CCOR | AOK | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 1.29% | 0.15% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $28M | $756M |
| Since | 2017 | 2008 |
| Dividend yield | 1.08% | 3.32% |
| Asset class | alternative | mixed asset |
| Region | north america | — |
| Strategy | option income | active selection |
| CAGR 1Y | -4.9% | +12.7% |
| CAGR 3Y | -2.5% | +9.2% |
| CAGR 5Y | -2.3% | +3.8% |
| Sharpe 3Y | -0.56 | 0.86 |
| Volatility 1Y | 6.92% | 5.78% |
| Max drawdown | -22.99% | -18.93% |
Green dot indicates the better value for that metric. Performance data is historical and does not predict future results.
Similar to CCOR and AOK
Explore further