Screener
CCOR vs AOM
Core Alternative ETF vs iShares Core 40/60 Moderate Allocation ETF
Key differences
- AOM costs 1.14% less per year.
- AOM is significantly larger than CCOR — larger funds tend to be more liquid and less likely to close.
- CCOR is classified as alternative, while AOM is mixed asset — different risk/return profiles.
- CCOR follows a option income strategy; AOM uses index tracking.
- Over the last 3 years, AOM has delivered higher annualized returns.
- AOM has a longer track record, which may reduce uncertainty around long-term behavior.
Side-by-side comparison
| CCOR | AOM | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 1.29% | 0.15% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $28M | $1.7B |
| Since | 2017 | 2008 |
| Dividend yield | 1.08% | 3.04% |
| Asset class | alternative | mixed asset |
| Region | north america | — |
| Strategy | option income | index tracking |
| CAGR 1Y | -4.9% | +15.2% |
| CAGR 3Y | -2.5% | +10.8% |
| CAGR 5Y | -2.3% | +4.9% |
| Sharpe 3Y | -0.56 | 0.96 |
| Volatility 1Y | 6.92% | 6.55% |
| Max drawdown | -22.99% | -19.96% |
Green dot indicates the better value for that metric. Performance data is historical and does not predict future results.
Similar to CCOR and AOM
Explore further