Screener
CCOR vs CSM
Core Alternative ETF vs ProShares Large Cap Core Plus
Key differences
- CSM costs 0.84% less per year.
- CSM is significantly larger than CCOR — larger funds tend to be more liquid and less likely to close.
- CCOR follows a option income strategy; CSM uses long short.
- Over the last 3 years, CSM has delivered higher annualized returns.
- CSM has a longer track record, which may reduce uncertainty around long-term behavior.
Side-by-side comparison
| CCOR | CSM | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 1.29% | 0.45% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $28M | $499M |
| Since | 2017 | 2009 |
| Dividend yield | 1.08% | 1.05% |
| Asset class | alternative | alternative |
| Region | north america | north america |
| Strategy | option income | long short |
| CAGR 1Y | -4.9% | +29.2% |
| CAGR 3Y | -2.5% | +23.1% |
| CAGR 5Y | -2.3% | +13.4% |
| Sharpe 3Y | -0.56 | 1.20 |
| Volatility 1Y | 6.92% | 12.11% |
| Max drawdown | -22.99% | -36.11% |
Green dot indicates the better value for that metric. Performance data is historical and does not predict future results.
Similar to CCOR and CSM
Explore further