Screener
CSM vs BLCR
ProShares Large Cap Core Plus vs iShares Large Cap Core Active ETF
Key differences
- BLCR costs 0.09% less per year.
- BLCR is significantly larger than CSM — larger funds tend to be more liquid and less likely to close.
- CSM is classified as alternative, while BLCR is equity — different risk/return profiles.
- CSM covers north america markets; BLCR covers global.
- CSM follows a long short strategy; BLCR uses active selection.
- CSM has a longer track record, which may reduce uncertainty around long-term behavior.
Side-by-side comparison
| CSM | BLCR | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 0.45% | 0.36% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $499M | $5.1B |
| Since | 2009 | 2023 |
| Dividend yield | 1.05% | 0.24% |
| Asset class | alternative | equity |
| Region | north america | global |
| Strategy | long short | active selection |
| CAGR 1Y | +29.2% | +49.4% |
| CAGR 3Y | +23.1% | N/A |
| CAGR 5Y | +13.4% | N/A |
| Sharpe 3Y | 1.20 | N/A |
| Volatility 1Y | 12.11% | 15.61% |
| Max drawdown | -36.11% | -21.29% |
Green dot indicates the better value for that metric. Performance data is historical and does not predict future results.
Similar to CSM and BLCR
Explore further