Screener
CCOR vs DFAC
Core Alternative ETF vs Dimensional U.S. Core Equity 2 ETF
Key differences
- DFAC costs 1.12% less per year.
- DFAC is significantly larger than CCOR — larger funds tend to be more liquid and less likely to close.
- CCOR is classified as alternative, while DFAC is equity — different risk/return profiles.
- CCOR follows a option income strategy; DFAC uses active selection.
- Over the last 3 years, DFAC has delivered higher annualized returns.
- DFAC has a longer track record, which may reduce uncertainty around long-term behavior.
Side-by-side comparison
| CCOR | DFAC | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 1.29% | 0.17% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $28M | $44.5B |
| Since | 2017 | 2007 |
| Dividend yield | 1.08% | 0.95% |
| Asset class | alternative | equity |
| Region | north america | north america |
| Strategy | option income | active selection |
| CAGR 1Y | -4.9% | +29.7% |
| CAGR 3Y | -2.5% | +21.0% |
| CAGR 5Y | -2.3% | N/A |
| Sharpe 3Y | -0.56 | 1.10 |
| Volatility 1Y | 6.92% | 12.32% |
| Max drawdown | -22.99% | -23.11% |
Green dot indicates the better value for that metric. Performance data is historical and does not predict future results.
Similar to CCOR and DFAC
Explore further