Screener
CCOR vs FPX
Core Alternative ETF vs First Trust US Equity Opportunities ETF
Key differences
- FPX costs 0.72% less per year.
- FPX is significantly larger than CCOR — larger funds tend to be more liquid and less likely to close.
- CCOR is classified as alternative, while FPX is equity — different risk/return profiles.
- CCOR follows a option income strategy; FPX uses index tracking.
- Over the last 3 years, FPX has delivered higher annualized returns.
- FPX has a longer track record, which may reduce uncertainty around long-term behavior.
Side-by-side comparison
| CCOR | FPX | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 1.29% | 0.57% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $28M | $1.3B |
| Since | 2017 | 2006 |
| Dividend yield | 1.08% | 0.52% |
| Asset class | alternative | equity |
| Region | north america | north america |
| Strategy | option income | index tracking |
| CAGR 1Y | -4.9% | +43.6% |
| CAGR 3Y | -2.5% | +32.8% |
| CAGR 5Y | -2.3% | +11.1% |
| Sharpe 3Y | -0.56 | 1.08 |
| Volatility 1Y | 6.92% | 23.17% |
| Max drawdown | -22.99% | -43.14% |
Green dot indicates the better value for that metric. Performance data is historical and does not predict future results.
Similar to CCOR and FPX
Explore further