Screener
FPX vs RONB
First Trust US Equity Opportunities ETF vs Baron First Principles ETF
Key differences
- FPX costs 0.43% less per year.
- FPX is significantly larger than RONB — larger funds tend to be more liquid and less likely to close.
- FPX follows a index tracking strategy; RONB uses active selection.
- FPX has a longer track record, which may reduce uncertainty around long-term behavior.
Side-by-side comparison
| FPX | RONB | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 0.57% | 1.00% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $1.3B | $388M |
| Since | 2006 | 2025 |
| Dividend yield | 0.52% | — |
| Asset class | equity | equity |
| Region | north america | north america |
| Strategy | index tracking | active selection |
| CAGR 1Y | +43.6% | N/A |
| CAGR 3Y | +32.8% | N/A |
| CAGR 5Y | +11.1% | N/A |
| Sharpe 3Y | 1.08 | N/A |
| Volatility 1Y | 23.17% | — |
| Max drawdown | -43.14% | -13.08% |
Green dot indicates the better value for that metric. Performance data is historical and does not predict future results.
Similar to FPX and RONB
Explore further