Screener
CCOR vs INTL
Core Alternative ETF vs Main International ETF
Key differences
- INTL costs 0.45% less per year.
- INTL is significantly larger than CCOR — larger funds tend to be more liquid and less likely to close.
- CCOR covers north america markets; INTL covers global.
- Over the last 3 years, INTL has delivered higher annualized returns.
- CCOR has a longer track record, which may reduce uncertainty around long-term behavior.
Side-by-side comparison
| CCOR | INTL | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 1.29% | 0.84% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $28M | $222M |
| Since | 2017 | 2022 |
| Dividend yield | 1.08% | 2.37% |
| Asset class | alternative | alternative |
| Region | north america | global |
| Strategy | option income | option income |
| CAGR 1Y | -4.9% | +26.7% |
| CAGR 3Y | -2.5% | +16.7% |
| CAGR 5Y | -2.3% | N/A |
| Sharpe 3Y | -0.56 | 0.85 |
| Volatility 1Y | 6.92% | 15.26% |
| Max drawdown | -22.99% | -14.48% |
Green dot indicates the better value for that metric. Performance data is historical and does not predict future results.
Similar to CCOR and INTL
Explore further