Screener
CCOR vs OALC
Core Alternative ETF vs OneAscent Large Cap Core ETF
Key differences
- OALC costs 0.80% less per year.
- OALC is significantly larger than CCOR — larger funds tend to be more liquid and less likely to close.
- CCOR is classified as alternative, while OALC is equity — different risk/return profiles.
- CCOR follows a option income strategy; OALC uses index tracking.
- Over the last 3 years, OALC has delivered higher annualized returns.
Side-by-side comparison
| CCOR | OALC | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 1.29% | 0.49% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $28M | $220M |
| Since | 2017 | 2021 |
| Dividend yield | 1.08% | 0.56% |
| Asset class | alternative | equity |
| Region | north america | north america |
| Strategy | option income | index tracking |
| CAGR 1Y | -5.1% | +34.7% |
| CAGR 3Y | -2.5% | +24.0% |
| CAGR 5Y | -2.2% | N/A |
| Sharpe 3Y | -0.56 | 1.29 |
| Volatility 1Y | 6.92% | 13.05% |
| Max drawdown | -22.99% | -26.82% |
Green dot indicates the better value for that metric. Performance data is historical and does not predict future results.
Similar to CCOR and OALC
Explore further