Screener
OALC vs CGUS
OneAscent Large Cap Core ETF vs Capital Group Core Equity ETF
Key differences
- CGUS costs 0.16% less per year.
- CGUS is significantly larger than OALC — larger funds tend to be more liquid and less likely to close.
- OALC follows a index tracking strategy; CGUS uses active selection.
- Over the last 3 years, OALC has delivered higher annualized returns.
Side-by-side comparison
| OALC | CGUS | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 0.49% | 0.33% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $220M | $10.3B |
| Since | 2021 | 2022 |
| Dividend yield | 0.56% | 0.90% |
| Asset class | equity | equity |
| Region | north america | north america |
| Strategy | index tracking | active selection |
| CAGR 1Y | +34.7% | +29.2% |
| CAGR 3Y | +24.0% | +22.9% |
| CAGR 5Y | N/A | N/A |
| Sharpe 3Y | 1.29 | 1.26 |
| Volatility 1Y | 13.05% | 12.48% |
| Max drawdown | -26.82% | -22.15% |
Green dot indicates the better value for that metric. Performance data is historical and does not predict future results.
Similar to OALC and CGUS
Explore further