Screener
CEFS vs BUCK
Saba Closed-End Funds ETF vs Simplify Treasury Option Income ETF
Key differences
- BUCK costs 2.26% less per year.
- CEFS follows a active selection strategy; BUCK uses option income.
- Over the last 3 years, CEFS has delivered higher annualized returns.
- CEFS has a longer track record, which may reduce uncertainty around long-term behavior.
Side-by-side comparison
| CEFS | BUCK | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 2.61% | 0.35% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $402M | $421M |
| Since | 2017 | 2022 |
| Dividend yield | 6.24% | 7.54% |
| Asset class | alternative | alternative |
| Region | — | north america |
| Strategy | active selection | option income |
| CAGR 1Y | +24.3% | +8.7% |
| CAGR 3Y | +21.5% | +5.4% |
| CAGR 5Y | +13.7% | N/A |
| Sharpe 3Y | 1.39 | 0.47 |
| Volatility 1Y | 9.92% | 3.28% |
| Max drawdown | -38.99% | -5.43% |
Green dot indicates the better value for that metric. Performance data is historical and does not predict future results.
Similar to CEFS and BUCK
Explore further