Screener
CEFS vs DMX
Saba Closed-End Funds ETF vs DoubleLine Multi-Sector Income ETF
Key differences
- DMX costs 2.11% less per year.
- CEFS is significantly larger than DMX — larger funds tend to be more liquid and less likely to close.
- CEFS is classified as alternative, while DMX is fixed income — different risk/return profiles.
- CEFS has a longer track record, which may reduce uncertainty around long-term behavior.
Side-by-side comparison
| CEFS | DMX | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 2.61% | 0.50% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $402M | $85M |
| Since | 2017 | 2024 |
| Dividend yield | 6.24% | 5.79% |
| Asset class | alternative | fixed income |
| Region | — | north america |
| Strategy | active selection | active selection |
| CAGR 1Y | +24.3% | +6.9% |
| CAGR 3Y | +21.5% | N/A |
| CAGR 5Y | +13.7% | N/A |
| Sharpe 3Y | 1.39 | N/A |
| Volatility 1Y | 9.92% | 2.25% |
| Max drawdown | -38.99% | -2.65% |
Green dot indicates the better value for that metric. Performance data is historical and does not predict future results.
Similar to CEFS and DMX
Explore further