Screener
CEFS vs INTL
Saba Closed-End Funds ETF vs Main International ETF
Key differences
- INTL costs 1.77% less per year.
- CEFS follows a active selection strategy; INTL uses option income.
- Over the last 3 years, CEFS has delivered higher annualized returns.
- CEFS has a longer track record, which may reduce uncertainty around long-term behavior.
Side-by-side comparison
| CEFS | INTL | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 2.61% | 0.84% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $402M | $222M |
| Since | 2017 | 2022 |
| Dividend yield | 6.24% | 2.37% |
| Asset class | alternative | alternative |
| Region | — | global |
| Strategy | active selection | option income |
| CAGR 1Y | +24.3% | +26.7% |
| CAGR 3Y | +21.5% | +16.7% |
| CAGR 5Y | +13.7% | N/A |
| Sharpe 3Y | 1.39 | 0.85 |
| Volatility 1Y | 9.92% | 15.26% |
| Max drawdown | -38.99% | -14.48% |
Green dot indicates the better value for that metric. Performance data is historical and does not predict future results.
Similar to CEFS and INTL
Explore further