Screener
CEFS vs MANI
Saba Closed-End Funds ETF vs Man Active Income ETF
Key differences
- CEFS follows a active selection strategy; MANI uses long short.
Side-by-side comparison
| CEFS | MANI | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 2.61% | — |
| Fund size (AUM) | $402M | — |
| Since | 2017 | — |
| Dividend yield | 6.24% | — |
| Asset class | alternative | alternative |
| Region | — | emerging markets |
| Strategy | active selection | long short |
| CAGR 1Y | +24.3% | N/A |
| CAGR 3Y | +21.5% | N/A |
| CAGR 5Y | +13.7% | N/A |
| Sharpe 3Y | 1.39 | N/A |
| Volatility 1Y | 9.92% | — |
| Max drawdown | -38.99% | -0.73% |
Green dot indicates the better value for that metric. Performance data is historical and does not predict future results.
Similar to CEFS and MANI
Explore further