Screener
CEFS vs RULE
Saba Closed-End Funds ETF vs Adaptive Core ETF
Key differences
- RULE costs 0.77% less per year.
- CEFS is significantly larger than RULE — larger funds tend to be more liquid and less likely to close.
- CEFS is classified as alternative, while RULE is mixed asset — different risk/return profiles.
- Over the last 3 years, CEFS has delivered higher annualized returns.
Side-by-side comparison
| CEFS | RULE | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 2.61% | 1.84% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $402M | $14M |
| Since | 2017 | 2021 |
| Dividend yield | 6.24% | 0.00% |
| Asset class | alternative | mixed asset |
| Region | — | — |
| Strategy | active selection | active selection |
| CAGR 1Y | +24.3% | +41.5% |
| CAGR 3Y | +21.5% | +16.7% |
| CAGR 5Y | +13.7% | N/A |
| Sharpe 3Y | 1.39 | 0.81 |
| Volatility 1Y | 9.92% | 19.69% |
| Max drawdown | -38.99% | -30.48% |
Green dot indicates the better value for that metric. Performance data is historical and does not predict future results.
Similar to CEFS and RULE
Explore further