Screener
CEFS vs SBAR
Saba Closed-End Funds ETF vs Simplify Barrier Income ETF
Key differences
- SBAR costs 1.86% less per year.
- CEFS follows a active selection strategy; SBAR uses option income.
- CEFS has a longer track record, which may reduce uncertainty around long-term behavior.
Side-by-side comparison
| CEFS | SBAR | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 2.61% | 0.75% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $402M | $291M |
| Since | 2017 | 2025 |
| Dividend yield | 6.24% | 12.88% |
| Asset class | alternative | alternative |
| Region | — | north america |
| Strategy | active selection | option income |
| CAGR 1Y | +24.3% | +13.1% |
| CAGR 3Y | +21.5% | N/A |
| CAGR 5Y | +13.7% | N/A |
| Sharpe 3Y | 1.39 | N/A |
| Volatility 1Y | 9.92% | 9.58% |
| Max drawdown | -38.99% | -5.32% |
Green dot indicates the better value for that metric. Performance data is historical and does not predict future results.
Similar to CEFS and SBAR
Explore further