Screener
CEW vs MATE
WisdomTree Emerging Currency Strategy Fund vs Man Active Trend Enhanced ETF
Key differences
CEW is a fixed income ETF, while MATE is an alternative ETF. CEW charges 0.55% a year and MATE 0.97%.
- CEW is a fixed income fund, while MATE is an alternative fund. They carry different risk/return profiles.
- CEW follows a active selection strategy; MATE uses tactical allocation.
- CEW costs 0.42% less per year.
- CEW has a longer track record, which may reduce uncertainty around long-term behavior.
Side-by-side comparison
| CEW | MATE | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 0.55% | 0.97% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $16M | $39M |
| Since | 2009 | 2025 |
| Dividend yield | 2.40% | — |
| Asset class | fixed income | alternative |
| Region | emerging markets | emerging markets |
| Strategy | active selection | tactical allocation |
| CAGR 1Y | +8.2% | N/A |
| CAGR 3Y | +7.1% | N/A |
| CAGR 5Y | +3.1% | N/A |
| Sharpe 3Y | 0.54 | N/A |
| Volatility 1Y | 6.36% | — |
| Max drawdown | -17.72% | -13.24% |
Beyond the comparison: Beacon helps you build, track, and project a portfolio with the ETFs you pick.