Screener
MATE vs EMCB
Man Active Trend Enhanced ETF vs WisdomTree Emerging Markets Corporate Bond Fund
Key differences
MATE is an alternative ETF, while EMCB is a fixed income ETF. MATE charges 0.97% a year and EMCB 0.61%.
- MATE is an alternative fund, while EMCB is a fixed income fund. They carry different risk/return profiles.
- MATE follows a tactical allocation strategy; EMCB uses active selection.
- EMCB costs 0.36% less per year.
- EMCB has a longer track record, which may reduce uncertainty around long-term behavior.
Side-by-side comparison
| MATE | EMCB | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 0.97% | 0.61% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $39M | $99M |
| Since | 2025 | 2012 |
| Dividend yield | — | 5.36% |
| Asset class | alternative | fixed income |
| Region | emerging markets | emerging markets |
| Strategy | tactical allocation | active selection |
| CAGR 1Y | N/A | +6.6% |
| CAGR 3Y | N/A | +8.0% |
| CAGR 5Y | N/A | +2.2% |
| Sharpe 3Y | N/A | 0.65 |
| Volatility 1Y | — | 4.19% |
| Max drawdown | -13.24% | -22.81% |
Beyond the comparison: Beacon helps you build, track, and project a portfolio with the ETFs you pick.