Screener
CFA vs CFO
VictoryShares US 500 Volatility Wtd ETF vs VictoryShares US 500 Enhanced Volatility Wtd ETF
Key differences
- CFA is classified as equity, while CFO is alternative — different risk/return profiles.
- CFA follows a index tracking strategy; CFO uses tactical allocation.
- Over the last 3 years, CFA has delivered higher annualized returns.
Side-by-side comparison
| CFA | CFO | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 0.35% | 0.35% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $532M | $408M |
| Since | 2014 | 2014 |
| Dividend yield | 1.25% | 1.25% |
| Asset class | equity | alternative |
| Region | north america | north america |
| Strategy | index tracking | tactical allocation |
| CAGR 1Y | +15.2% | +15.2% |
| CAGR 3Y | +13.8% | +9.8% |
| CAGR 5Y | +8.2% | +4.3% |
| Sharpe 3Y | 0.78 | 0.52 |
| Volatility 1Y | 10.89% | 10.94% |
| Max drawdown | -37.74% | -24.36% |
Similar to CFA and CFO
Explore further