Screener
CGBL vs AOM
Capital Group Core Balanced ETF vs iShares Core 40/60 Moderate Allocation ETF
Key differences
- AOM costs 0.18% less per year.
- CGBL is significantly larger than AOM — larger funds tend to be more liquid and less likely to close.
- CGBL follows a active selection strategy; AOM uses index tracking.
- AOM has a longer track record, which may reduce uncertainty around long-term behavior.
Side-by-side comparison
| CGBL | AOM | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 0.33% | 0.15% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $6.1B | $1.7B |
| Since | 2023 | 2008 |
| Dividend yield | 1.92% | 3.04% |
| Asset class | mixed asset | mixed asset |
| Region | — | — |
| Strategy | active selection | index tracking |
| CAGR 1Y | +19.6% | +15.2% |
| CAGR 3Y | N/A | +10.8% |
| CAGR 5Y | N/A | +4.9% |
| Sharpe 3Y | N/A | 0.96 |
| Volatility 1Y | 9.65% | 6.55% |
| Max drawdown | -11.66% | -19.96% |
Green dot indicates the better value for that metric. Performance data is historical and does not predict future results.
Similar to CGBL and AOM
Explore further