Screener
CGBL vs BCFN
Capital Group Core Balanced ETF vs Baron Financials ETF
Key differences
- CGBL costs 0.47% less per year.
- CGBL is significantly larger than BCFN — larger funds tend to be more liquid and less likely to close.
- CGBL is classified as mixed asset, while BCFN is equity — different risk/return profiles.
- CGBL follows a active selection strategy; BCFN uses index tracking.
Side-by-side comparison
| CGBL | BCFN | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 0.33% | 0.80% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $6.1B | $48M |
| Since | 2023 | 2019 |
| Dividend yield | 1.92% | 0.00% |
| Asset class | mixed asset | equity |
| Region | — | — |
| Strategy | active selection | index tracking |
| CAGR 1Y | +19.6% | N/A |
| CAGR 3Y | N/A | N/A |
| CAGR 5Y | N/A | N/A |
| Sharpe 3Y | N/A | N/A |
| Volatility 1Y | 9.65% | — |
| Max drawdown | -11.66% | -20.95% |
Green dot indicates the better value for that metric. Performance data is historical and does not predict future results.
Similar to CGBL and BCFN
Explore further