Screener
CGBL vs CCOR
Capital Group Core Balanced ETF vs Core Alternative ETF
Key differences
- CGBL costs 0.96% less per year.
- CGBL is significantly larger than CCOR — larger funds tend to be more liquid and less likely to close.
- CGBL is classified as mixed asset, while CCOR is alternative — different risk/return profiles.
- CGBL follows a active selection strategy; CCOR uses option income.
- CCOR has a longer track record, which may reduce uncertainty around long-term behavior.
Side-by-side comparison
| CGBL | CCOR | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 0.33% | 1.29% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $6.1B | $28M |
| Since | 2023 | 2017 |
| Dividend yield | 1.92% | 1.08% |
| Asset class | mixed asset | alternative |
| Region | — | north america |
| Strategy | active selection | option income |
| CAGR 1Y | +19.6% | -4.9% |
| CAGR 3Y | N/A | -2.5% |
| CAGR 5Y | N/A | -2.3% |
| Sharpe 3Y | N/A | -0.56 |
| Volatility 1Y | 9.65% | 6.92% |
| Max drawdown | -11.66% | -22.99% |
Green dot indicates the better value for that metric. Performance data is historical and does not predict future results.
Similar to CGBL and CCOR
Explore further