Screener
CGBL vs MSLC
Capital Group Core Balanced ETF vs Morgan Stanley Pathway Large Cap Equity ETF
Key differences
CGBL is a mixed asset ETF, while MSLC is an equity ETF. CGBL charges 0.33% a year and MSLC 0.39%.
- CGBL is a mixed asset fund, while MSLC is an equity fund. They carry different risk/return profiles.
- CGBL follows a active selection strategy; MSLC uses index tracking.
- CGBL costs 0.06% less per year.
- MSLC has a longer track record, which may reduce uncertainty around long-term behavior.
Side-by-side comparison
| CGBL | MSLC | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 0.33% | 0.39% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $6.7B | $4.0B |
| Since | 2023 | 1991 |
| Dividend yield | 1.86% | 0.80% |
| Asset class | mixed asset | equity |
| Region | — | global |
| Strategy | active selection | index tracking |
| CAGR 1Y | +15.7% | +20.5% |
| CAGR 3Y | N/A | N/A |
| CAGR 5Y | N/A | N/A |
| Sharpe 3Y | N/A | N/A |
| Volatility 1Y | 9.86% | 12.04% |
| Max drawdown | -11.66% | -17.86% |
Beyond the comparison: Beacon helps you build, track, and project a portfolio with the ETFs you pick.