Screener
CGBL vs SPAM
Capital Group Core Balanced ETF vs Themes Cybersecurity ETF
Key differences
- CGBL is significantly larger than SPAM — larger funds tend to be more liquid and less likely to close.
- CGBL is classified as mixed asset, while SPAM is equity — different risk/return profiles.
- CGBL follows a active selection strategy; SPAM uses index tracking.
Side-by-side comparison
| CGBL | SPAM | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 0.33% | 0.35% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $6.1B | $2M |
| Since | 2023 | 2023 |
| Dividend yield | 1.92% | 0.48% |
| Asset class | mixed asset | equity |
| Region | — | north america |
| Strategy | active selection | index tracking |
| CAGR 1Y | +21.0% | +24.2% |
| CAGR 3Y | N/A | N/A |
| CAGR 5Y | N/A | N/A |
| Sharpe 3Y | N/A | N/A |
| Volatility 1Y | 9.69% | 25.42% |
| Max drawdown | -11.66% | -24.02% |
Green dot indicates the better value for that metric. Performance data is historical and does not predict future results.
Similar to CGBL and SPAM
Explore further