Screener
CGCB vs BCPL
Capital Group Core Bond ETF vs BNY Mellon Core Plus ETF
Key differences
- CGCB costs 0.13% less per year.
- CGCB is significantly larger than BCPL — larger funds tend to be more liquid and less likely to close.
- CGCB follows a active selection strategy; BCPL uses index tracking.
- BCPL has a longer track record, which may reduce uncertainty around long-term behavior.
Side-by-side comparison
| CGCB | BCPL | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 0.27% | 0.40% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $4.8B | $313M |
| Since | 2023 | 2012 |
| Dividend yield | 4.23% | 3.86% |
| Asset class | fixed income | fixed income |
| Region | north america | north america |
| Strategy | active selection | index tracking |
| CAGR 1Y | +5.6% | N/A |
| CAGR 3Y | N/A | N/A |
| CAGR 5Y | N/A | N/A |
| Sharpe 3Y | N/A | N/A |
| Volatility 1Y | 3.99% | — |
| Max drawdown | -5.16% | -2.95% |
Green dot indicates the better value for that metric. Performance data is historical and does not predict future results.
Similar to CGCB and BCPL
Explore further