Screener
CGDV vs DURA
Capital Group Dividend Value ETF vs VanEck Durable High Dividend ETF
Key differences
- CGDV is significantly larger than DURA — larger funds tend to be more liquid and less likely to close.
- CGDV follows a active selection strategy; DURA uses index tracking.
- Over the last 3 years, CGDV has delivered higher annualized returns.
Side-by-side comparison
| CGDV | DURA | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 0.33% | 0.30% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $33.0B | $38M |
| Since | 2022 | 2018 |
| Dividend yield | 1.23% | 3.28% |
| Asset class | equity | equity |
| Region | north america | north america |
| Strategy | active selection | index tracking |
| CAGR 1Y | +33.0% | +25.9% |
| CAGR 3Y | +25.7% | +11.9% |
| CAGR 5Y | N/A | +7.8% |
| Sharpe 3Y | 1.49 | 0.64 |
| Volatility 1Y | 11.75% | 14.72% |
| Max drawdown | -21.81% | -33.15% |
Green dot indicates the better value for that metric. Performance data is historical and does not predict future results.
Similar to CGDV and DURA
Explore further