Screener
CGGG vs CAML
Capital Group U.S. Large Growth ETF vs Congress Large Cap Growth ETF
Key differences
- CGGG costs 0.26% less per year.
- CAML is significantly larger than CGGG — larger funds tend to be more liquid and less likely to close.
- CGGG follows a index tracking strategy; CAML uses active selection.
Side-by-side comparison
| CGGG | CAML | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 0.39% | 0.65% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $78M | $376M |
| Since | 2025 | 2023 |
| Dividend yield | — | 0.00% |
| Asset class | equity | equity |
| Region | north america | north america |
| Strategy | index tracking | active selection |
| CAGR 1Y | N/A | +15.0% |
| CAGR 3Y | N/A | N/A |
| CAGR 5Y | N/A | N/A |
| Sharpe 3Y | N/A | N/A |
| Volatility 1Y | — | 14.65% |
| Max drawdown | -17.74% | -21.06% |
Green dot indicates the better value for that metric. Performance data is historical and does not predict future results.
Similar to CGGG and CAML
Explore further