Screener
CGGO vs IWF
Capital Group Global Growth Equity ETF vs iShares Russell 1000 Growth ETF
Key differences
Both CGGO and IWF are equity ETFs. CGGO charges 0.47% a year and IWF 0.18%. The main difference: CGGO follows a active selection strategy; IWF uses index tracking.
- CGGO follows a active selection strategy; IWF uses index tracking.
- CGGO covers global markets; IWF covers North America.
- IWF costs 0.29% less per year.
- IWF is much larger than CGGO. Larger funds are usually more liquid and less likely to close.
- Over the last three years, IWF has delivered higher annualized returns.
- IWF has a longer track record, which may reduce uncertainty around long-term behavior.
Side-by-side comparison
| CGGO | IWF | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 0.47% | 0.18% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $11.4B | $132.3B |
| Since | 2022 | 2000 |
| Dividend yield | 1.71% | 0.33% |
| Asset class | equity | equity |
| Region | global | north america |
| Strategy | active selection | index tracking |
| CAGR 1Y | +32.1% | +19.3% |
| CAGR 3Y | +21.4% | +23.7% |
| CAGR 5Y | N/A | +14.2% |
| Sharpe 3Y | 1.02 | 1.02 |
| Volatility 1Y | 18.15% | 15.95% |
| Max drawdown | -24.90% | -32.72% |
Beyond the comparison: Beacon helps you build, track, and project a portfolio with the ETFs you pick.