Screener
CGGO vs IWO
Capital Group Global Growth Equity ETF vs iShares Russell 2000 Growth ETF
Key differences
Both CGGO and IWO are equity ETFs. CGGO charges 0.47% a year and IWO 0.24%. The main difference: CGGO follows a active selection strategy; IWO uses index tracking.
- CGGO follows a active selection strategy; IWO uses index tracking.
- CGGO covers global markets; IWO covers North America.
- IWO costs 0.23% less per year.
- Over the last three years, CGGO has delivered higher annualized returns.
- IWO has a longer track record, which may reduce uncertainty around long-term behavior.
Side-by-side comparison
| CGGO | IWO | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 0.47% | 0.24% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $11.4B | $14.7B |
| Since | 2022 | 2000 |
| Dividend yield | 1.71% | 0.40% |
| Asset class | equity | equity |
| Region | global | north america |
| Strategy | active selection | index tracking |
| CAGR 1Y | +32.1% | +35.6% |
| CAGR 3Y | +21.4% | +17.3% |
| CAGR 5Y | N/A | +5.4% |
| Sharpe 3Y | 1.02 | 0.66 |
| Volatility 1Y | 18.15% | 22.08% |
| Max drawdown | -24.90% | -42.01% |
Beyond the comparison: Beacon helps you build, track, and project a portfolio with the ETFs you pick.