Screener
CGGR vs GKAT
Capital Group Growth ETF vs Scharf Global Opportunity ETF
Key differences
- CGGR costs 0.20% less per year.
- CGGR is significantly larger than GKAT — larger funds tend to be more liquid and less likely to close.
- GKAT has a longer track record, which may reduce uncertainty around long-term behavior.
Side-by-side comparison
| CGGR | GKAT | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 0.39% | 0.59% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $22.2B | $158M |
| Since | 2022 | 2014 |
| Dividend yield | 0.10% | 0.46% |
| Asset class | equity | equity |
| Region | global | — |
| Strategy | active selection | active selection |
| CAGR 1Y | +22.6% | N/A |
| CAGR 3Y | +26.5% | N/A |
| CAGR 5Y | N/A | N/A |
| Sharpe 3Y | 1.14 | N/A |
| Volatility 1Y | 16.28% | — |
| Max drawdown | -28.90% | -10.41% |
Green dot indicates the better value for that metric. Performance data is historical and does not predict future results.
Similar to CGGR and GKAT
Explore further