Screener
CGGR vs KAT
Capital Group Growth ETF vs Scharf ETF
Key differences
- CGGR costs 0.36% less per year.
- CGGR is significantly larger than KAT — larger funds tend to be more liquid and less likely to close.
- KAT has a longer track record, which may reduce uncertainty around long-term behavior.
Side-by-side comparison
| CGGR | KAT | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 0.39% | 0.75% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $22.2B | $688M |
| Since | 2022 | 2011 |
| Dividend yield | 0.10% | 0.39% |
| Asset class | equity | equity |
| Region | global | — |
| Strategy | active selection | active selection |
| CAGR 1Y | +22.6% | N/A |
| CAGR 3Y | +26.5% | N/A |
| CAGR 5Y | N/A | N/A |
| Sharpe 3Y | 1.14 | N/A |
| Volatility 1Y | 16.28% | — |
| Max drawdown | -28.90% | -9.25% |
Green dot indicates the better value for that metric. Performance data is historical and does not predict future results.
Similar to CGGR and KAT
Explore further